Scientist Implant: Study Shows Non-Earth Origin
Unknowncountry Exclusive –
Micrograph of unknown structure in implant.
This week’s Dreamland features a scientist discussing an implant that was placed in his body in February of 2008. This is the most exhaustively studied of all the fourteen objects that have so far been extracted from close encounter witnesses by Dr. Roger Leir and his surgical team. Prior it its being removed from Mr. Smith’s body, like a number of other similar objects, it was found to be broadcasting an FM signal. Keep reading to learn the conclusions of the lab report on this implant.
1. The sample consists mainly of iron, with a high carbon and oxygen content. The iron base material contains 5.2% nickel, and is highly magnetic. Traces of iridium and other precious metals, tungsten, gallium, and germanium strongly suggest the sample’s metallic portion was derived from meteoric iron and is extraterrestrial in origin.
2. The extreme differences in the isotopic ratios of the sample elements from the isotopic ratios of elements found on Earth provide evidence the sample material may be of extraterrestrial origin.
3. The sample consists of two major phases; an iron/nickel (Fe/Ni) phase and a nonmetallic phase resembling a hard biological substance, such as shell, tooth, or bone. The iridescence of the non-metallic phase, seen in light microscopy, suggests a layered microstructure similar to mother-of-pearl or opal.
4. The similarity of the non-metallic phase composition to biological material may be responsible the patient’s lack of immune response to the object.
5. This non-metallic phase is high in carbon, oxygen, silicon, magnesium, aluminum, sulfur, and phosphorus, and is present as an outer covering on the sample and as inclusions in the metallic Fe/Ni phase.
6. The non-metallic phase of the sample also contains bundles of carbon nanotubes, perhaps covered or filled, with calcium and magnesium silicates, phosphates and sulfates.
7. The inclusions of the non-metallic phase have unusual shapes which suggest artificiality and functionality. This, along with the fact the object was emitting radio signals before removal, strongly indicates this is a manufactured nanotechnological device which was inserted in patient Smith for a definite purpose.
8. The function of the device cannot be determined with certainty from the available data and the device may have had multiple functions and missions. It is possible two of its functions involved monitoring of the physiological state of Mr. Smith’s body and mood/mind control. Copyright, April 30th, 2009
Unknowncountry.com depends on you for our ability to offer information like this. Subscribe today.