Bucky Balls , coming to a Walmart near you.

NASA’S Spitzer Finds Solid Buckyballs in Space

WASHINGTON — Astronomers using data from NASA’s Spitzer Space Telescope have, for the first time, discovered buckyballs in a solid form in space. Prior to this discovery, the microscopic carbon spheres had been found only in gas form.

Formally named buckminsterfullerene, buckyballs are named after their resemblance to the late architect Buckminster Fuller’s geodesic domes. They are made up of 60 carbon molecules arranged into a hollow sphere, like a soccer ball. Their unusual structure makes them ideal candidates for electrical and chemical applications on Earth, including superconducting materials, medicines, water purification and armor.

In the latest discovery, scientists using Spitzer detected tiny specks of matter, or particles, consisting of stacked buckyballs. They found them around a pair of stars called “XX Ophiuchi,” 6,500 light-years from Earth.

“These buckyballs are stacked together to form a solid, like oranges in a crate,” said Nye Evans of Keele University in England, lead author of a paper appearing in the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. “The particles we detected are miniscule, far smaller than the width of a hair, but each one would contain stacks of millions of buckyballs.”

Buckyballs were detected definitively in space for the first time by Spitzer in 2010. Spitzer later identified the molecules in a host of different cosmic environments. It even found them in staggering quantities, the equivalent in mass to 15 Earth moons, in a nearby galaxy called the Small Magellanic Cloud.

In all of those cases, the molecules were in the form of gas. The recent discovery of buckyballs particles means that large quantities of these molecules must be present in some stellar environments in order to link up and form solid particles. The research team was able to identify the solid form of buckyballs in the Spitzer data because they emit light in a unique way that differs from the gaseous form.

“This exciting result suggests that buckyballs are even more widespread in space than the earlier Spitzer results showed,” said Mike Werner, project scientist for Spitzer at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif. “They may be an important form of carbon, an essential building block for life, throughout the cosmos.”

Buckyballs have been found on Earth in various forms. They form as a gas from burning candles and exist as solids in certain types of rock, such as the mineral shungite found in Russia, and fulgurite, a glassy rock from Colorado that forms when lightning strikes the ground. In a test tube, the solids take on the form of dark, brown “goo.”

“The window Spitzer provides into the infrared universe has revealed beautiful structure on a cosmic scale,” said Bill Danchi, Spitzer program scientist at NASA Headquarters in Washington. “In yet another surprise discovery from the mission, we’re lucky enough to see elegant structure at one of the smallest scales, teaching us about the internal architecture of existence.”

NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) in Pasadena, Calif., manages the Spitzer Space Telescope mission for NASA’s Science Mission Directorate in Washington. Science operations are conducted at the Spitzer Science Center at the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena. Caltech manages JPL for NASA.

The Fireballs of February — Enjoy

A strange breed of fireball is streaking through the skies this month, and NASA is urging folks on the ground to take notice.
February’s fireballs — a term that describes meteors that appear brighter in the sky than Venus — aren’t more numerous than normal, but their appearance and trajectory are odd, experts say.
“These fireballs are particularly slow and penetrating,” meteor expert Peter Brown, a physics professor at the University of Western Ontario, said in a statement. “They hit the top of the atmosphere moving slower than 15 kilometers per second (33,500 mph), decelerate rapidly and make it to within 50 kilometers (31 miles) of Earth’s surface.”
Beginning February with a bang
The month’s fireball action began on Feb. 1, when a meteor lit up the skies over central Texas, putting on a dazzling show for people in the Dallas-Fort Worth area.
“It was brighter and long-lasting than anything I’ve seen before,” said witness Daryn Morran. “The fireball took about eight seconds to cross the sky. I could see the fireball start to slow down; then it exploded like a firecracker artillery shell into several pieces, flickered a few more times and then slowly burned out.”
The fireball was about as bright as the full moon, and was spotted by NASA cameras in New Mexico, more than 500 miles (805 km) away. It was likely caused by an object 3 to 6 feet (1 to 2 meters) wide, NASA researchers said.
And the meteors have kept coming, well into February.
Advertise | AdChoices

“This month, some big space rocks have been hitting Earth’s atmosphere,” said Bill Cooke of the Meteoroid Environment Office at NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Ala. “There have been five or six notable fireballs that might have dropped meteorites around the United States.”
Oddball fireballs
So far in February, NASA’s All-Sky Fireball Network — which currently consists of six cameras set up in Georgia, Alabama, Tennessee and New Mexico — has photographed about half a dozen of these strange, slow-moving, deep-diving fireballs. They have ranged in size from basketballs to buses.

Cooke has analyzed their orbits and determined where the strange meteors are coming from.
“They all hail from the asteroid belt, but not from a single location in the asteroid belt,” he said. “There is no common source for these fireballs, which is puzzling.”
The “fireballs of February” have puzzled astronomers for decades. Skywatchers first noticed an increase in the number of deep-penetrating, bright meteors during February in the 1960s and ’70s, Brown said.
Research to date has been inconclusive, with some studies reporting a surge of these fireballs in February and others detecting no such trend, Brown added.
But NASA’s All-Sky Fireball Network could end up solving the mystery. Cooke and his colleagues plan to keep adding cameras to the network, increasing its coverage across North America.
“The beauty of our smart multi-camera system,” Cooke said, “is that it measures orbits almost instantly. We know right away when a fireball flurry is under way — and we can tell where the meteoroids came from.”
More space news from msnbc.com

OLDEST Super Nova From NASA

This image combines data from four space telescopes to create a multi-wavelength view of all that remains of RCW 86, the oldest documented example of a supernova. Chinese astronomers witnessed the event in 185 A.D., documenting a mysterious “guest star” that remained in the sky for eight months. X-ray images from NASA’s Chandra X-ray Observatory and the European Space Agency’s XMM-Newton Observatory were combined to form the blue and green colors in the image. The X-rays show the interstellar gas that has been heated to millions of degrees by the passage of the shock wave from the supernova. Infrared data from NASA’s Spitzer Space Telescope and WISE, Wide-Field Infrared Survey Explorer, shown in yellow and red, reveal dust radiating at a temperature of several hundred degrees below zero, warm by comparison to normal dust in our Milky Way galaxy. By studying the X-ray and infrared data, astronomers were able to determine that the cause of the explosion was a Type Ia supernova, in which an otherwise-stable white dwarf, or dead star, was pushed beyond the brink of stability when a companion star dumped material onto it. Furthermore, scientists used the data to solve another mystery surrounding the remnant — how it got to be so large in such a short amount of time. By blowing away wind prior to exploding, the white dwarf was able to clear out a huge “cavity,” a region of very low-density surrounding the system. The explosion into this cavity was able to expand much faster than it otherwise would have. This is the first time that this type of cavity has been seen around a white dwarf system prior to explosion. Scientists say the results may have significant implications for theories of white-dwarf binary systems and Type Ia supernovae. RCW 86 is approximately 8,000 light-years away. At about 85 light-years in diameter, it occupies a region of the sky in the southern constellation of Circinus that is slightly larger than the full moon. This image was compiled in October 2011. Image Credit: X-ray: NASA/CXC/SAO & ESA; Infared: NASA/JPL-Caltech/B. Williams (NCSU)

Hitchhikers Guide to the Aurora Galaxy (Wheres, Whens and Whys) Jan 31, 2012—-AccuWeather Astronomy expert Daniel Vogler

This is the first post in a series of posts written by AccuWeather Astronomy expert Daniel Vogler. This post is meant to be used over and over again as a reference item when the Sun is busy.
All too often, we get asked during a solar flare event, “What should we expect? Where do we look? When? Will I see it?” Well, this will hopefully answer those questions as simply as possible. First off, we need to understand what we are looking at and what causes it.
The Aurora borealis, or Northern Lights, are the result of the collision of plasma-type matter with the Earth’s magnetosphere. When the magnetic field in the solar wind and the magnetic field of the magnetosphere are anti-parallel, the fields can melt together, and the solar wind can drag the magnetospheric field and plasma along. This is the southward Bz I talk about from time to time. Eventually, the magnetosphere responds by dumping electrons and protons into the high latitude upper atmosphere where the energy of the plasma can be dissipated. This, then, results in aurora.
The aurora looks like an oval donut, and the Earth rotates underneath it. For this reason, the oval is farthest south at your location near local midnight (12 a.m.-3 a.m. local time). This does not mean, however, that during a strong geomagnetic storm, will be best viewed at midnight.
Look northward toward the pole (south if in Southern Hemisphere).
Solar Cycle 24 is currently just getting underway and will peak some time around mid-2013. This means that the sunspot count will be at its highest point, meaning more chances for auroras.
Here are some keywords that you will hear often as the Solar Cycle gets underway:
Solar Flares and their size: sudden brightenings observed over the Sun surface or the solar limb, which are interpreted as large energy releases of up to 6 ? 10^25 joules of energy. Broken into different letter categories:
C – Weak
M – Medium
X – Strongest
Coronal Mass Ejection (CME for short):
a massive amount of plasma released due to the instability of the coronal magnetic field. Consists of mainly electrons and protons, the main reason for the aurora effect.
Geomagnetic Storm:
a temporary imbalance of Earth’s magnetosphere. Allows the protons and other charged particles to enter the thermosphere.
There are five distinct levels of intensity of the geomagnetic storm, which determines how far south the aurora will travel.
G1 (Minor)
Power systems: weak power grid fluctuations can occur.
Spacecraft operations: minor impact on satellite operations possible.
Other systems: migratory animals are affected at this and higher levels; aurora is commonly visible at high latitudes (northern Michigan and Maine).
G2 (Moderate)
Power systems: high-latitude power systems may experience voltage alarms, long-duration storms may cause transformer damage.
Spacecraft operations: corrective actions to orientation may be required by ground control; possible changes in drag affect orbit predictions.
Other systems: HF radio propagation can fade at higher latitudes, and aurora has been seen as low as New York and Idaho (typically 55° geomagnetic latitude)
G3 (Strong)
Power systems: voltage corrections may be required, false alarms triggered on some protection devices.
Spacecraft operations: surface charging may occur on satellite components, drag may increase on low-Earth-orbit satellites, and corrections may be needed for orientation problems.
Other systems: intermittent satellite navigation and low-frequency radio navigation problems may occur, HF radio may be intermittent, and aurora has been seen as low as Illinois and Oregon (typically 50° geomagnetic latitude)
G4 (Severe)
Power systems: possible widespread voltage control problems and some protective systems will mistakenly trip out key assets from the grid.
Spacecraft operations: may experience surface charging and tracking problems, corrections may be needed for orientation problems.
Other systems: induced pipeline currents affect preventive measures, HF radio propagation sporadic, satellite navigation degraded for hours, low-frequency radio navigation disrupted, and aurora has been seen as low as Alabama and northern California (typically 45° geomagnetic latitude)
G5 (Extreme)
Power systems: widespread voltage control problems and protective system problems can occur, some grid systems may experience complete collapse or blackouts. Transformers may experience damage.
Spacecraft operations: may experience extensive surface charging, problems with orientation, up-link/down-link and tracking satellites.
Other systems: pipeline currents can reach hundreds of amps, HF (high frequency) radio propagation may be impossible in many areas for one to two days, satellite navigation may be degraded for days, low-frequency radio navigation can be out for hours, and aurora has been seen as low as Florida and southern Texas (typically 40° geomagnetic latitude)
Kp Index
A scale in which helps determine the southern edge of the auroral oval at local midnight
1-9, 1 being the lowest, closer to the poles and 9 being the highest, farthest south.
1-4 = no geomagnetic storm occurring, auroras mainly around the pole
5 = G1 (Michigan, Maine)
6 = G2 (New York, Idaho)
7 = G3 (Illinois, Oregon)
8 = G4 (Alabama, northern California)
9 = G5 (Florida, South Texas)
Please use this as a reference when dealing with solar events as the Solar Cycle kicks in to high gear.

Please join in or begin a conversation by clicking here. You can leave your comments, as well as be part of a community where discussions on any astronomy subject are taking place. We are now over 2,400 likes. Tell your friends about this site and blog, and have them weigh in on some exciting issues. We encourage open discussion and will never criticize any idea, and no negative conversation will be allowed.
My experts will keep you up to date on any astronomy-related subject. Please feel free to share your opinions!
And please keep the astronomy pictures coming! They have been simply amazing! We had an amazingly busy week last week, the busiest by far here at AWA. Please keep it up. Ask questions, comments, share anything!
From Accuweather.com

Failed Russian Mars Probe Crashes into Pacific Ocean

I believe again — the Mars Folks want — no probing

From Scientific American
Although it can be tough for observers in the West to vet such claims from the Russians, fears that Phobos-Grunt’s fall would cause dangerous chemicals to rain from the sky are probably unfounded, experts say
By Mike Wall and SPACE.com
Experts predicted correctly that Russia’s failed Mars probe Phobos-Grunt would crash back to Earth in mid-January 2012. This artist’s concept shows fuel burning from a ruptured fuel tank as the spacecraft reenters the atmosphere.

A failed Russian Mars probe came crashing back to Earth Sunday (Jan. 15) in a death plunge over the Pacific Ocean, according to Russian news reports.

After languishing in Earth orbit for more than two months, the 14.5-ton Phobos-Grunt spacecraft fell at around 12:45 p.m. EST (1745 GMT) Sunday, apparently slamming into the atmosphere over an empty stretch of the Pacific, Russian officials told the Ria Novosti news agency.

“Phobos-Grunt fragments have crashed down in the Pacific Ocean,” Alexei Zolotukhin, an official with Russia’s Defense Ministry, was quoted by Ria Novosti as saying. Zolotukhin said that the spacecraft crashed about 776 miles (1,250 kilometers) west of the island of Wellington, the news agency reported.

Before the crash, Russia’s Federal Space Agency, known as Roscosmos, released a map that estimated a potential crash zone in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean sometime between 12:50 p.m. and 1:34 p.m. EST (1750-1834 GMT) on Sunday.

The huge probe likely broke apart as it re-entered, with the vast majority of the pieces burning up in the atmosphere, but some big componets were expected to survive the fiery fall. At the moment, it’s not clear how many chunks of Phobos-Grunt survived, or exactly where this hail of hardy debris touched down.

Roscosmos had estimated that 20 to 30 chunks of Phobos-Grunt, weighing a total of no more than 440 pounds (200 kilograms), might hit the Earth’s surface. Officials also stressed that the probe’s huge reservoir of toxic fuel would burn up high over Earth. [Photos of the Phobos-Grunt mission]

While it can be tough for observers in the West to vet such claims from the Russians, fears that Phobos-Grunt’s fall would cause dangerous chemicals to rain from the sky are probably unfounded, experts say.

“They did acknowledge early on that the [fuel] tanks are made of aluminum,” Nick Johnson, chief scientist of NASA’s Orbital Debris Program Office at the Johnson Space Center in Houston, told SPACE.com. “Aluminum rarely survives re-entry, so there’s no reason to really doubt them.”

Russian officials have also repeatedly stated that there’s little danger of contamination from a tiny amount of radioactive material onboard Phobos-Grunt, about 10 micrograms of Cobalt-57 that forms part of a science instrument on the craft.

Failed mission to Mars

The crash marked a dramatic end to Phobos-Grunt’s brief and troubled life. The $165 million probe launched Nov. 8 on a mission to collect soil samples from the Martian moon Phobos and send them back to Earth in a return capsule (“grunt” means “soil” in Russian).

Phobos-Grunt’s main engines were supposed to fire shortly after liftoff to send the spacecraft on its way to the Red Planet. That never happened, however, and the probe got stuck in Earth orbit.

Russian officials still aren’t sure what went wrong. They hinted recently that some form of sabotage may be responsible for Phobos-Grunt’s problems, and perhaps for the other four embarrassing space failures Russia suffered in 2011 as well.

Phobos-Grunt was also carrying China’s first attempt at a Mars orbiter, along with an experiment run by the United States-based Planetary Society designed to study how a long journey through deep space affects micro-organisms.

Twin NASA Spacecrafts Begin to Orbit the Moon – Via Accuweather

accuweather.com
Jan 1, 2012; 12:07 AM ET
NASA’s twin spacecraft to study the Moon while in lunar orbit will both enter orbit soon.
Named Gravity Recovery And Interior Laboratory (GRAIL), GRAIL-A was put in orbit at 4:21 p.m. EST Dec. 31, and GRAIL-B will settle into orbit at 5:05 p.m. EST on New Year’s Day.
NASA’s Apollo crews took about three days to travel to the Moon. In contrast, these spacecraft were launched from Cape Canaveral Air Force Station on Sept. 10, 2011, the GRAIL spacecraft are taking about 30 times that long to cover the more than 2.5 million miles to get there.
Over the following weeks, the GRAIL team will execute a series of burns to each spacecraft to reduce their orbital period from 11.5 hours down to just under two hours. At the start of the science phase in March 2012, the two GRAILs will be in a near-polar, near-circular orbit with an altitude of about 34 miles.
When science collection begins, the spacecraft will transmit radio signals to figure out exactly the distance between them as they orbit the Moon. As they fly over areas of greater and lesser gravity, caused both by visible features such as mountains and craters and by masses hidden beneath the lunar surface, they will move slightly toward and away from each other. An instrument aboard each spacecraft will measure the changes in their relative velocity very precisely, and scientists will translate this information into a high-resolution map of the Moon’s gravitational field. The data will allow mission scientists to understand what goes on below the surface of the Moon. This information will increase our knowledge of how Earth and its rocky neighbors in the inner solar system developed into the diverse worlds we see today.
An artist’s rendition of the twin GRAIL spacecraft in Moon’s orbit

Please join in or begin a conversation by clicking here. You can leave your comments, as well as be part of a community where discussions on any astronomy subject taking place. We are now over 2,250 likes. Tell your friends about this site and blog, and have them weigh in on some exciting issues. We encourage open discussion and will never criticize any idea, and no negative conversation will be allowed.
My experts will keep you up-to-date on any astronomy related subject. Please feel free to share your opinions!

Russia Mars – Probe Failure -Comments from Earth.

Comments — Looks like again the Non- humans are not going to let another close-up viewing of Mars — I guess with the US Crafts having taken those pictures of the “Face” and other structures they ( Aliens) built on Mars, they ( Aliens) are not that interested having the Russians having a even closer look.
So they decommissioned the Russian Craft.

PS and note The US recently send a Rover to Mars, odds are against success.

Russia Has No Idea Where Failed Mars Probe Will Crash
Updated: Tuesday, 22 Nov 2011, 8:02 AM EST
Published : Tuesday, 22 Nov 2011, 8:02 AM EST

(NewsCore) – Russian space agency Roscosmos all but gave up on regaining contact with its lost Mars probe, and it has no idea where exactly it will crash back down to Earth when it finally falls out of orbit.

“There is little chance that we will be able to achieve this mission,” the deputy head of Roscosmos, Vitaly Davydov, was quoted as saying by the Itar-Tass news agency. “We need to be realists. Since we could not establish contact for so long, the chances to carry out this expedition right now are very slim.”

The unmanned Phobos-Grunt spacecraft blasted off toward the Red Planet on Nov. 9, where it was hoped to bring back rock and soil samples from the moon Phobos.

But its engines failed to put in the correct course, and the craft only managed to reach an orbit about 125 miles (200 kilometers) from Earth.

Roscosmos still does not know what went wrong, Davydov said.

“If we gain contact and understand what is happening with the probe, then maybe we will be able to draw conclusions. But now we have no information from the craft,” Davydov said. “There is no telemetry. We simply don’t understand what is happening.”

Roscosmos earlier warned that the craft was likely to fall back to Earth sometime in January. But Davydov said it is impossible to predict the exact location.

“The crash area of any craft can only be estimated in the final 24 hours,” he said. “Before then, saying what will fall and where is pointless.”

NASA: Sunspot Cycle Via ForbiddenknowledgeTV.com

ForbiddenknowledgeTV.com

Here are some amazing high resolution footage
of the Sun.

The number of sunspots increases and decreases
in a regular cycle of approximately 11 years, when
it reverses polarity.

Although the Sun’s recent activity has been relatively
cool as it approaches the peak of this cycle, human
civilization has never been as reliant on the
technologies that can be affected by the geomagnetic
storms that result from the fluctuations of the
Sun.